The Relationship between Deep Learning Approach, Scientific Approach, and Teacher Creativity in Grade IV Indonesian Language Lesson Planning

Authors

  • Erni Yuniar Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Indonesia
  • Tatu Hilaliyah Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Indonesia
  • Isti Rusdiyani Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v18i3.10022

Keywords:

deep learning approach, scientific approach, teacher creativity, lesson planning, Indonesian language learning

Abstract

Teacher creativity is essential for developing meaningful and student-centered lesson plans, particularly within Indonesia’s emerging deep learning framework. However, empirical evidence comparing the relationships of teachers’ mastery of the deep learning and scientific approaches with their creativity in developing Rencana Pembelajaran Mendalam (RPM) remains limited. This study examined these relationships among Grade IV elementary school teachers. A quantitative correlational design with an ex-post facto framework was employed. Twelve Grade IV teachers from six elementary schools in Majasari District, Pandeglang, were selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using three validated self-report questionnaires measuring deep learning mastery, scientific approach mastery, and teacher creativity in RPM development, supplemented by RPM document analysis. Data were analyzed using Pearson correlation and multiple correlation analyses. Deep learning mastery was very strongly and significantly associated with teacher creativity, r = .899, 95% CI [.672, .972], p < .001. Scientific approach mastery showed a moderate significant association with teacher creativity, r = .585, 95% CI [.017, .868], p = .042. Collectively, both approaches were strongly associated with teacher creativity, R = .903, p = .001. The findings provide preliminary evidence that mastery of deep learning is more strongly associated with creative RPM development than mastery of the scientific approach. Given the small purposively selected sample and reliance primarily on self-report measures, larger multi-site studies using independent document-based creativity assessments are needed to confirm these findings.

References

Alwandi Yanta Krisna, Urip Sulistiyo, & Rustam. (2024). Critical Thinking in Indonesian Language Learning. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 8(2), 384–393. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v8i2.76748

Azwar, S. (2018). Reliabilitas dan Validitas (4th ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.

Che Mat, N., & Jamaludin, K. A. (2024). Effectiveness of Practices and Applications of Student-Centered Teaching and Learning in Primary Schools: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i3/21733

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th ed.). Routledge.

Cortez, M., & Chua, N. E. (2023). Instructional Creativity, Innovation Practices, and Digital Literacy for an Improved Classroom Ecosystem. International Journal of Research Publications, 133(1). https://doi.org/10.47119/IJRP1001331920235490

Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2022). The Systematic Design of Instruction (9th ed.). Pearson.

Eha, E., Dewi, R. S., & Pribadi, R. A. (2024). Proses Pengembangan Kreativitas Peserta Didik Melalui Kegiatan Pembelajaran Berbasis Pendekatan Saintifik di SD Negeri Ciomas 2. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Perkhasa: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Dasar, 10(1), 256–277. https://doi.org/10.31932/jpdp.v10i1.3156

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. (2018). Deep Learning: Engage the World, Change the World. Corwin Press.

Hosnan, M. (2014). Pendekatan Saintifik dan Kontekstual dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21. Ghalia Indonesia.

Jayadi, U., & Isro'iyah, L. (2025). Meta-Analysis of Guru Penggerak and Kurikulum Merdeka Initiatives in Enhancing Education Quality in Indonesia. International Journal of Education and Digital Learning (IJEDL), 3(3), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.47353/ijedl.v3i3.164

Majid, A. (2020). Strategi Pembelajaran. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mehta, J., & Fine, S. (2019). In Search of Deeper Learning: The Quest to Remake the American High School. Harvard University Press.

Munandar, U. (2014). Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Rineka Cipta.

Nofamataro Zebua. (2025). Education Transformation: Implementation of Deep Learning in 21st-Century Learning. Harmoni Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(2), 146–152. https://doi.org/10.62383/hardik.v2i2.1405

Purwanto, N. (2010). Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.). (2024). Instructional-Design Theories and Models: The Learner-Centered Paradigm of Education (Vol. IV). Routledge.

Riduwan, & Sunarto. (2012). Pengantar Statistika untuk Penelitian: Pendidikan, Sosial, Komunikasi, Ekonomi, dan Bisnis. Alfabeta.

Sanjaya, W. (2021). Perencanaan dan Desain Sistem Pembelajaran. Kencana.

Sari, W. P. F., & Khair, N. (2022). Pengaruh Pendekatan Saintifik terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Peserta Didik. Journal of Classroom Action Research, 4(4), 117–122.

Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2017). Variables Associated with Achievement in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 143(6), 565–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000098

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sujarweni, V. W. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian. Pustaka Baru Press.

Suparman, A. (2021). Desain Instruksional Modern: Panduan Para Pengajar dan Inovator Pendidikan (4th ed.). Erlangga.

Taufik, R. (2025). Hubungan antara Pembelajaran Mendalam dan Pengembangan Karakter Literat Siswa Sekolah Dasar dalam Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Journal Sultra Elementary School, 6(2), 1256–1265.

Uno, H. B. (2016). Perencanaan Pembelajaran. Bumi Aksara.

Utami, A. R., Suhendri, & Dian, P. (2019). Hubungan antara Kreativitas Guru dengan Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Indonesia, 4(2), 56–62.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-31

How to Cite

Yuniar, E., Hilaliyah, T., & Rusdiyani, I. (2026). The Relationship between Deep Learning Approach, Scientific Approach, and Teacher Creativity in Grade IV Indonesian Language Lesson Planning. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 18(3), 3369–3380. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v18i3.10022

Citation Check