Spiritual-Based Curriculum Enactment in Elementary Islamic Religious Education: Teachers’ Perspectives from Demak, Indonesia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v18i3.10039

Keywords:

spiritual-based curriculum; islamic elementary education; teacher perspectives; digital spiritual literacy; religious moderation

Abstract

Digital transformation presents both pedagogical opportunities and ethical challenges for Islamic Religious Education (PAI), particularly in integrating technology with religious moderation, spiritual development, and moral formation. This study examined how elementary PAI teachers conceptualize and report enacting a spiritual-based curriculum and identified the conditions shaping its implementation. A qualitative descriptive design using inductive qualitative content analysis was employed. Data were obtained from open-ended questionnaire responses from 20 PAI teachers across 20 elementary schools in Demak Regency, Central Java, Indonesia. One hundred nonblank item-level responses were coded, categorized, and abstracted into themes. Descriptive counts were used to indicate thematic prevalence without implying statistical generalization. Six themes emerged: technology as a scaffold for religious meaning; an uneven transition from digital consumption to student production; dialogic and ethical approaches to wasatiyyah; tension between religious habituation and spiritual autonomy; relational modelling alongside contested disciplinary practices; and digital risks, teacher capacity, and an enactment gap between reported practices and proposed activities. The findings suggest that spiritual-based curriculum enactment depends less on technological sophistication than on teachers’ ethical mediation, reflective pedagogy, relational modelling, and capacity to connect religious routines with meaningful reflection. The study proposes an integrated framework emphasizing ethical digital mediation, dialogic moral formation, reflective spiritual internalization, relational modelling, and ecological enactment capacity. Further research using classroom observations, interviews, documents, and pupil perspectives is needed to examine actual enactment and educational outcomes.

References

Alexander, R. (2020). A dialogic teaching companion (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351040143

Alirahman, A. D., Sumantri, M. S., & Japar, M. (2023). The development of Islamic religious education and character materials online based in elementary schools. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(6), e550. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i6.550

Aningsih, Zulela, M., Neolaka, A., Iasha, V., & Setiawan, B. (2022). How is the education character implemented? The case study in Indonesian elementary school. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 12(1), 371. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2022-0029

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.

Campbell, H. A., & Tsuria, R. (Eds.). (2021). Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in digital media (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.

Hasan, M., Taufiq, M., & Elmhemit, H. (2023). Digital transformation of Islamic education in Pesantren Madura. TADRIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 18(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.19105/tjpi.v18i2.10535

Khotimah, H., Manshur, U., Zaini, A. W., Sanjani, M. A. F., & Suhermanto, S. (2024). Increasing the competence of Islamic religious education teachers from a madrasah-based management perspective. Managere: Indonesian Journal of Educational Management, 6(1), 13–26.

Amelda, M., Jonson, L., Kafaur, K., Sharema, N., & Ahbadi, S. (2024). Learning strategies in religious education to foster spiritual values among Generation Z. International Journal of Education Management and Religion, 1(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.71305/ijemr.v1i1.149

Maryam, S. (2023). Effort to increase student learning interes through spiritual intelligence values. Journal of Modern Islamic Studies and Civilization, 1(1), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.59653/jmisc.v1i01.3

Mawardi, I. A., & Sukandar, A. (2025). Islamic education in the digital era: Pedagogical competence, technology acceptance, and managerial supervision. Journal of Science and Education (JSE), 6(1.1), 1–11.

Miller, J. P. (2007). The holistic curriculum (2nd ed.). University of Toronto Press.

Mintasih, D., Sukiman, S., & Purnama, S. (2024). Integration of digital technology in Islamic religious education learning: A qualitative study on teachers’ competence and implementation models in secondary schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 13(1), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpi.2024.131.85-96

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Morrison, B. E., & Vaandering, D. (2012). Restorative justice: Pedagogy, praxis, and discipline. Journal of School Violence, 11(2), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2011.653322

Muflihin, A., & Madrah, M. Y. (2019). Implementation of Al-Ghazali’s Islamic education philosophy in the modern era. Al-Fikri: Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Pendidikan Islam, 2(1), 13–27.

Muflihin, A., & Makhshun, T. (2020). Peran guru pendidikan agama Islam dalam meningkatkan literasi digital siswa sebagai kecakapan abad 21. Ta’dibuna, 3(1), 91–103.

Muharom, F., Farhan, M., Athoillah, S., Rozihan, Muflihin, A., & Huda, M. (2024). Digital technology skills for professional development: Insights into quality instruction performance. In A. Joshi, M. Mahmud, R. G. Ragel, & S. Kartik (Eds.), ICT: Applications and social interfaces (Vol. 908, pp. 371–384). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0210-7_30

Nugraha, M. S., & Qodriani, S. H. (2024). Technology integration in Islamic religious education learning planning: Policy framework and adoption challenges. Zona Education Indonesia, 2(4), 1–14.

Nurdalia. (2023). Learning Islamic religious education through contextual learning models: Islamic moderation studies. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 2(3), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v2i3.878

Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2026). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Hasnida, S. S., Adrian, R., & Siagian, N. A. (2023). Tranformasi pendidikan di era digital. Jurnal Bintang Pendidikan Indonesia, 2(1), 110–116. https://doi.org/10.55606/jubpi.v2i1.2488

Sudarmin, S., Salmia, S., & Asdar, A. (2023). Professional competency mastering in 21st century teacher performance effectiveness in elementary schools. JED (Jurnal Etika Demokrasi), 8(4), 550–559. https://doi.org/10.26618/jed.v8i4.10917

Sulistyoko, A., Ghazali, A., Sutrisno, S., & Leheza, Y. (2024). Religious moderation and the challenge of identity politics: A comparative study of Wasatiyyah Islam narratives in Malaysia and Indonesia. ASEAN Journal of Islamic Studies and Civilization (AJISC), 1(1), 101–135.

Zaid, B., Fedtke, J., Shin, D. D., El Kadoussi, A., & Ibahrine, M. (2022). Digital Islam and Muslim millennials: How social media influencers reimagine religious authority and Islamic practices. Religions, 13(4), 335. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13040335

Downloads

Published

2026-09-02

How to Cite

Muflihin, A. (2026). Spiritual-Based Curriculum Enactment in Elementary Islamic Religious Education: Teachers’ Perspectives from Demak, Indonesia. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 18(3), 3422–3435. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v18i3.10039

Citation Check