Evaluation of Implementing the Video in University for Online Learning Amid Covid-19 Pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i2.1949Keywords:
Covid-19, Evaluating, Online Learning, VideoAbstract
This study aims to determine the results of the evaluation of the implementation of video at universities related to online learning during the Covid-19 pandemic. This study uses a qualitative approach with the evaluation method of the Stufflebeam model, namely CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product). Data were collected through documentation, observation, and interviews. The data were analyzed through the stages of data reduction, data presentation and concluding. The results of the study concluded that the use of videos at universities during online learning activities was good. The shortcomings found were in the input aspect to improve the digital competence of lecturers in mastering the latest technology as a learning medium. The learning process must be improved again to stimulate students to be more active during discussions. Meanwhile, the product aspect related to learning outcomes also shows a decrease in student achievement and attitudes in motivating themselves to learn. The results of this study have implications for the understanding of lecturers and universities about the readiness of facilities and technology for online learning activities.
References
Almås, A. G., Bueie, A. A., & Aagaard, T. (2021). From digital competence to Professional Digital Competence. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), Vol. 5, pp. 70–85. OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University. https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.4233
Amin, F. M., & Sundari, H. (2020). Efl students’ preferences on digital platforms during emergency remote teaching: Video conference, lms, or messenger application? Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 362–378. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.16929
Baber, H. (2020). Determinants of students’ perceived learning outcome and satisfaction in online learning during the pandemic of COVID19. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 7(3), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.20448/JOURNAL.509.2020.73.285.292
Bajrami, L., & Ismaili, M. (2016). The Role of Video Materials in EFL Classrooms. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 502–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2016.10.068
Brame, C. J. (2016). Effective Educational Videos: Principles and Guidelines for Maximizing Student Learning from Video Content. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(4), es6.1-es6.6. https://doi.org/10.1187/CBE.16-03-0125
Bravo, E., Amante, B., Simo, P., Enache, M., & Fernandez, V. (2011). Video as a new teaching tool to increase student motivation. 2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON 2011, 638–642. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2011.5773205
Carutasu, G., Cotet, G. B., & Carutasu, N. L. (2021). PANDEMIC IMPACT OVER DIGITAL SKILLS TRAINING NEEDS. INTED2021 Proceedings. IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2021.0130
Chassiakos, Y. (Linda) R., & Stager, M. (2020). Current trends in digital media: How and why teens use technology. Technology and Adolescent Health, 25–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817319-0.00002-5
Hakim, L. (2020). Increasing elementary school education quality through committee school participation approach. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 12(2), 428–438.
Kopaneva, T., & Pervil, T. (2021). The usage of authentic video materials for the formation of cross-cultural competence of students in foreign language classes. E3S Web of Conferences, 273. https://doi.org/10.1051/E3SCONF/202127312154
Mali, D., & Lim, H. (2021). How do students perceive face-to-face/blended learning as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic? The International Journal of Management Education, 19(3), 100552. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJME.2021.100552
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis; An Expanded Sourcebook. New Delhi: Sage Publication.
Mishra, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A. (2020). Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJEDRO.2020.100012
Moleong, L. J. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Rosdakarya.
Ruhe, V., & Zumbo, B. D. (2009). Evaluation in Distance Education and E-learning: The Unfolding Model. New York: Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2010.516907
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP Model for Evaluation. In International Handbook of Educational Evaluation (pp. 31–62). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_4
Tartavulea, C. V., Albu, C. N., Albu, N., Dieaconescu, R. I., & Petre, S. (2020). Online teaching practices and the effectiveness of the educational process in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic. Amfiteatru Economic, 22(55), 920–936. https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2020/55/920
Vasiljanovna, E. G. (2021). Digital competence of the future teacher: Component composition. ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 11(6), 330–337. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-7137.2021.01622.0
Yulianingsih, W., Suhanadji, S., Nugroho, R., & Mustakim, M. (2020). Keterlibatan Orangtua dalam Pendampingan Belajar Anak selama Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 5(2), 1138–1150. https://doi.org/10.31004/OBSESI.V5I2.740
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.



