POLICY EVALUATION OF NINE-YEARS LEARNING COMPULSORY OF BASIC EDUCATION: OBJECTIVES CONTEXT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v12i2.226Keywords:
Policy, Basic Education, Compulsory LearningAbstract
The purpose of this research was to evaluate the policy of the nine-year learning compulsory of basic education from the objectives context. The research method used evaluation research approach through descriptive qualitative method. The data collection methods used interviews, observations, and documents. The data analysis technique used three stages, namely data reduction, data presentation, discussion, and drawing conclusions. The findings conclude that the objective of the nine-year compulsory education is in accordance with the government rule from the central and local governments. The methods used by the Serang government in achieving the goal of the nine-year compulsory education are the use of both natural and human resources, the participation of all parties in a comprehensive manner to carry out educational activities, and an interactive system of coordination between all parties. The implication of this research is seen in the implementation of education and management of education policies in the city of Serang.
References
Ahmadi, A., & Laei, S. (2012). Public Education: Compulsory and Free? A Paradox. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 868–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.749
Akbar, M. F. (2016). Evaluasi Kebijakan Program Pemberian Dana Bantuan Operasional Sekolah. Jurnal Analisis Dan Pelayanan Publik, 2(1).
Anti, A. (2015). IMPLEMENTASI PROGRAM WAJIB BELAJAR 9 TAHUN DI PEKANBARU TAHUN 2012. Jom FISIP, 2(2).
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education (8 Edition). CA: Cengage Learning.
Aziz, S., Mahmood, M., & Rehman, Z. (2018). Implementation of CIPP Model for Quality Evaluation at School Level: A Case Study. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(1), 189. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v5i1.1553
Cai, W., Chen, G., & Zhu, F. (2017). Has the compulsory school merger program reduced the welfare of rural residents in China? China Economic Review, 46, 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2017.07.010
Darma, I. K. (2019). The effectiveness of teaching program of CIPP evaluation model. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT & Scientific Research, 5(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjeis.v5n3.619
Jin, Y., & Zhang, H. (2008). Research on the Costs of Running Compulsory Education Standards: Comparison of Compulsory Education Internationally. International Education Studies, 1(3).
Kauko, J. (2019). The Finnish Comprehensive School. In Great Policy Successes (pp. 122–142). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198843719.003.0007
Lu, C. H. (2018). Social status, compulsory education, and growth. Economic Modelling, 68(June), 425–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.08.013
Mróz, A., Ocetkiewicz, I., & Tomaszewska, B. (2020). What should be included in education programmes – The socio-education analysis for sustainable management of natural resources. Journal of Cleaner Production, 250, 119556. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2019.119556
Mugiri, & Lestari, W. (2013). INSTRUMEN EVALUASI PROGRAM DANA BOS MODEL CIPP. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 2(1).
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2008). PP Nomor 47 Tahun 2008 tentang Wajib Belajar. PP Nomor 47 Tahun 2008 Tentang Wajib Belajar, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Risku, M. (2014). A Historical Insight on Finnish Education Policy from 1944 to 2011. Italian Journal of Sociology Of, (June).
Solstad, K. J., & Andrews, T. (2020). From rural to urban to rural to global: 300 years of compulsory schooling in rural Norway. Journal of Rural Studies, 74, 294–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.10.034
Warju, W. (2016). Educational Program Evaluation using CIPP Model. Innovation of Vocational Technology Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.17509/invotec.v12i1.4502
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.



