Analysis of University Student Satisfaction Levels with the Learning Process on Five Dimensions of Service Quality (SERVQUAL)

Authors

  • Rahmawati Rahmawati Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Universitas Almuslim, Indonesia
  • Johar Permana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Diding Nurdin Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Cepi Triatna Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Fadhli Fadhli Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i2.2355

Keywords:

Satisfaction, Learning process, Service quality

Abstract

Each academic course must conduct a self-evaluation, one method of which is a survey of students' attitudes towards the teaching and learning they experienced. Service quality affects how satisfied students are with the institution. There are five service quality dimensions (SERVQUAL): Reliability, Responsiveness, Assurance, Empathy, and Tangible. The purpose of the study was to analyze students' level of satisfaction with the learning process on the 5 SERVQUAL Dimensions and evaluate which dimension had the highest level of satisfaction. The object of research is the active students of Almuslim University in the Odd Semester of the Academic Year 2021/2022 totalling 1,023 people. Quantitative research approach with the type of survey research. Data was collected using a Google form questionnaire which was distributed online. Analysis of the data by calculating the Percentage of Respondents' Achievement Level (RAL) followed by calculating the Community Satisfaction Index (CSI). The results showed that the highest RAL was in the Assurance Dimension, the average score was 3.23, and the RAL was 80.65% (excellent category), while the lowest RAL was in the Tangible Dimension, the average core was 3.06, and the RAL was 76.44% (excellent category). Analytical findings on a per-item basis There are five areas that need tweaking: The incorporation of e-learning technology and instructor feedback into the classroom setting. Hotspot facilities, as well as learning facilities in the lecture room, are readily available to accommodate the lecturers' high availability for academic consultations and/or Final Project discussions. The Assurance Dimension received the greatest CSI score (3.23), and the highest CSI conversion score (80.65), while the Tangible aspect received the lowest CSI score (2.94), and the lowest CSI conversion value (73.38). Overall, we received a CSI conversion score of 79.45, for a grand total of 3.18 (good).

References

Ajami, M. P., Elola, L. N., & Pastor, J. (2018). Validation and Improvement of the European Customer Satisfaction Index for the Spanish Wine Sector. The TQM Journal , 30(2).

Anderson, E. W., Fornell, C., & Lehmann, D. R. (1994). Customer Satisfaction, Market Share, and Profitability: Findings from Sweden. Journal of Marketing, 58(3).

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (Revisi). PT Rineka Cipta.

Asmin, A. I., Wahyono, E., & Hasby, M. (2021). Analisis Kepuasan Belajar Daring Mahasiswa Universitas Cokroaminoto Palopo. Indonesian Journal of Learning Studies, 1(2).

Bakrie, M., Sujanto, B., & Rugaiah. (2019). The Influence of Service Quality, Institutional Reputation, Students’ Satisfaction on Students’ Loyalty in Higher Education Institution. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies , 1(5).

Calvo-Porral, C., Lévy-Mangin, J. P., & Novo-Corti, I. (2013). Perceived Quality in Higher Education: an Empirical Study. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 31(6).

Cresswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Pearson.

Dewi, A. P., & Sudarwati, W. (2020). Strategi Peningkatan Kepuasan Mahasiswa terhadap Proses Pendidikan pada Program Studi Teknik Industri Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta. JISI: Jurnal Integrasi Sistem Industri , 7(1).

Dewi, N. R., & Asikin, M. (2009). Kepuasan Mahasiswa terhadap Proses Perkuliahan di FMIPA Unnes. Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan, 39(2).

Gallifa, J. (2010). Student Perceptions of Service Quality in a Multi-Campus Higher Education System in Spain. Quality Assurance in Education, 18(2).

Hastowo, H. (2012). Pedoman Penyusunan Indeks Kepuasan Masyarakat (IKM) Unit Pelayanan di Lingkungan Batan.

Latif, K. F., Latif, I., Sahibzada, U. F., & Ullah, M. (2017). In Search of Quality: Measuring Higher Education Service Quality (HiEduQual). Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 30(7).

Le, T. M. H., Nguyen, V. K. L., Nguyen, T. S., Le, T. H. O., & Duong, T. N. M. D. (2021). Assessment of Students’ Satisfaction of Facility Service Quality in Private Universities. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 9(5).

Pangaribuan, R. M., & Ginting, K. B. (2021). Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Mahasiswa terhadap Proses Pembelajaran dan Kualitas Layanan Akademik Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Differensial, 03(02).

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1).

Santoso, S. (2008). Panduan Lengkap Menguasai SPSS 16. PT Elex Media Komputindo.

Shurair, A. S. . (2019). Stakeholder’s Perception of Service Quality:a Case in Qatar . Quality Assurance in Education, 27(4).

Siming, L., Niamatullah, Gao, J., Xu, D., & Shafi, K. (2015). Factors leading to Students’ Satisfaction in the Higher Learning Institutions. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(31).

Snipes, R. L., & Thomson, N. (1999). An Empirical Study of the Factors Underlying Student Service Quality Perceptions in Higher Education. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 3(1).

Srikanthan, G., & Dalrymple, J. F. (2007). A Conceptual Overview of a Holistic Model for Quality in Higher Education. International Journal of Educational Management, 21(3).

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. PT Alfabet.

Sujarweni, V. W. (2014). SPSS untuk Penelitian. Pustaka Baru Press.

Supriyono. (2018). Deskripsi Tingkat Kepuasan dengan Tingkat Kepentingan Peserta Pelatihan pada Pelayanan Balai Pelatihan Kesehatan di Batam. Jurnal Wacana Kinerja, 21(2).

Teeroovengadu, V., Nunkoo, R., Gronroos, C., Kamalanabhan, T. J., & Seebaluck, A. (2019). Higher Education Service Quality, Student Satisfaction and Loyalty: Validating the HESQUAL Scale and Testingan Improved Structural Model. Quality Assurance in Education, 27(04).

Temple, P., Callender, C., Grove, L., & Kersh, N. (2016). Managing the Student Experience in English Higher Education: Differing Responses to market Pressures. London Review of Education, 14(1).

Downloads

Published

2023-05-04

How to Cite

Rahmawati, R., Permana, J., Nurdin, D., Triatna, C., & Fadhli, F. (2023). Analysis of University Student Satisfaction Levels with the Learning Process on Five Dimensions of Service Quality (SERVQUAL). AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(2), 1944–1957. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i2.2355

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 2 (2023): AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.