LECTURERS' PERFORMANCE IN INCREASING OF LEARNING QUALITY THROUGH SELF-MONITORING EVALUATION

Authors

  • Andi Rahman Universitas PGRI Palembang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v12i2.303

Keywords:

Performance, Learning, Self-Monitoring

Abstract

The research objective was to get the use of teachers’ self-monitoring strategies in conducting performance evaluations, so that the quality of learning in class becomes high quality. The research method used descriptive qualitative. Data collection techniques used observation and interviews. The data analysis technique consists of three stages, namely data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The research was conducted at the Ahmad Dahlan Institute of Technology and Business Jakarta. The results showed that the teacher always evaluated the performance of the learning and teaching process on a regular basis, namely at the end of each semester. This is done to evaluate the overall learning outcomes. Meanwhile, learning evaluation is also carried out after each learning process by students’ input. The implication of the research results is the development of a teacher’s performance evaluation system at the University, either carried out by individual or university leaders

Author Biography

Andi Rahman, Universitas PGRI Palembang

Manajemen Pendidikan

References

Alicias, E. R. (2005, May 6). Toward an objective evaluation of teacher performance: The use of variance partitioning analysis, VPA. Education Policy Analysis Archives. Arizona State University. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v13n30.2005

Ariasa Giri, I. M. (2016). SUPERVISI PENDIDIKAN DALAM PENINGKATAN MUTU PENDIDIKAN DI SEKOLAH. Jurnal Penjaminan Mutu, 2(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.25078/jpm.v2i1.60

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education (8 Edition). CA: Cengage Learning.

Atkinson, A., Burgess, S., Croxson, B., Gregg, P., Propper, C., Slater, H., & Wilson, D. (2009). Evaluating the impact of performance-related pay for teachers in England. Labour Economics, 16(3), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2008.10.003

Bacher-Hicks, A., Chin, M. J., Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2019). An experimental evaluation of three teacher quality measures: Value-added, classroom observations, and student surveys. Economics of Education Review, 73, 101919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2019.101919

Barnett, J. A. (2012). Experienced Teacher Evaluation through Performance Appraisals: Is Consistency Possible? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1853–1860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.137

Cuevas, R., Ntoumanis, N., Fernandez-Bustos, J. G., & Bartholomew, K. (2018). Does teacher evaluation based on student performance predict motivation, well-being, and ill-being? Journal of School Psychology, 68, 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.03.005

Dewi, C. (2018). MANAJEMEN PENGEMBANGAN KOMPETENSI DOSEN. JMSP: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Supervisi Pendidikan, 3(1).

Ghufron, A., & Mubarok, H. (2018). SUPERVISI AKADEMIK SEBAGAI DASAR PENGEMBANGAN PEMBELAJARAN GURU. ELEMENTARY, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.21043/elementary.v4i2.3000

Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2014). Skills, productivity and the evaluation of teacher performance. Economics of Education Review, 40, 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2014.03.002

Kuriloff, P., Jordan, W., Sutherland, D., & Ponnock, A. (2019). Teacher preparation and performance in high-needs urban schools: What matters to teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 83, 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.04.001

Lauermann, F., & König, J. (2016). Teachers’ professional competence and wellbeing: Understanding the links between general pedagogical knowledge, self-efficacy and burnout. Learning and Instruction, 45, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEARNINSTRUC.2016.06.006

Marey, R., Hesham, G., Magdd, A., & Toprak, M. (2020). Re-conceptualizing teacher evaluation and supervision in the light of educational reforms in Egypt. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2(1), 100081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100081

Masliah, E. (2019). Pengembangan Model Supervisi Akademik Teknik Mentoring dalam Upaya Peningkatan Mutu Pembelajaran. Indoensian Journal of Educational Management & Administration Review, 3(2).

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis; An Expanded Sourcebook. New Delhi: Sage Publication.

O’Flaherty, J., & Liddy, M. (2018). The impact of development education and education for sustainable development interventions: a synthesis of the research. Environmental Education Research, 24(7), 1031–1049. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1392484

Rahman, M. H. (2014). Professional Competence , Pedagogical Competence and the Performance of Junior High School of Science Teachers. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(9), 75–80. Retrieved from www.iiste.org

Skovholt, K., Nordenström, E., & Stokoe, E. (2019). Evaluative conduct in teacher–student supervision: When students assess their own performance. Linguistics and Education, 50, 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.03.001

Suknaisith, A., Wongwanich, S., & Piromsombat, C. (2014). Development of Teacher Performance in Educational Measurements and Evaluation through Self-monitoring Strategies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1683–1688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.456

Tyagita, B. P. A., & Iriani, A. (2018). Strategi Peningkatan Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Untuk Meningkatkan Mutu Sekolah. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 5(2), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2018.v5.i2.p165-176

Downloads

Published

2020-12-30

How to Cite

Rahman, A. (2020). LECTURERS’ PERFORMANCE IN INCREASING OF LEARNING QUALITY THROUGH SELF-MONITORING EVALUATION. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 12(2), 492–501. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v12i2.303

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2020): AL-ISHLAH: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.