One Day One Article One Week One Chapter Program in Fostering Students’ Literacy: Implementation and Perception
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i3.3056Keywords:
literacy, perception, One Day One Article One Week One ChapterAbstract
References
Abuloum, A., Farah, A., Kaskaloglu, E., & Yaakub, A. (2019). College students’ usage of and preferences for print and electronic textbooks. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(7), 80–97. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i07.9871
Aharony, N., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2018). Students’ academic reading preferences: An exploratory study. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 50(1).
Artelt, Cordula; Schiefele, Ulrich; Schneider, W. (2001). Predictors of Reading Literacy. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16(3).
Carrell, P. L., & Carson, J. G. (1997). Extensive and intensive reading in an EAP setting. English for Speciï¬c Purposes, 1.
Davis, C. (1995). Extensive Reading : an expensive extravagance? ELT Journal, 49(4).
Day, R., & Bamford, J. (2002). Top ten principles for teaching extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14(2). https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/cfe8828c-29d8-40d1-b8f1-751118559223/content
Delgadova, E. (2015). Reading Literacy as One of the Most Significant Academic Competencies for the University Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 178(June), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.145
Ferrer, E., & Staley, K. (2016). Designing an EFL Reading Program to Promote Literacy Skills, Critical Thinking, and Creativity. CATESOL Journal, 28(2), 79–104. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1119613&site=ehost-live
Galyani-Moghaddam, G., & Taheri, P. (2021). Public library circulation records: What do they reveal about users’ reading preferences? Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 53(2), 328–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000620949643
Geske, A., & Ozola, A. (2008). Factors Influencing Reading Literacy At the Primary School Level. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 6, 71–77.
Griva, E., Alevriadou, A., & Semoglou, K. (2012). Reading preferences and strategies employed by primary school students: Gender, socio-cognitive and citizenship issues. International Education Studies, 5(2), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v5n2p24
Huang, H. chou. (2013). E-reading and e-discussion: EFL learners’ perceptions of an e-book reading program. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(3), 258–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.656313
Kang, E. . (2015). Promoting L2 vocabulary learning through narrow reading. RELC Journal, 46(2).
Kern, R., & Friedman, H. S. (2009). Early educational milestones as predictors of lifelong academic achievement, midlife adjustment, and longevity. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(4).
Macalister, J. (2008). Integrating Extensive Reading into an English for Academic Purposes Program. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 8(1), 23–34. http://search.proquest.com/docview/85671668?accountid=8330%5Cnhttp://jn8sf5hk5v.search.serialssolutions.com/directLink?&atitle=Integrating+Extensive+Reading+into+an+English+for+Academic+Purposes+Program&author=Macalister,+John&issn=1533242X&title=The+Read
Merga, M. K., & Mat Roni, S. (2018). Children’s perceptions of the importance and value of reading. Australian Journal of Education, 62(2), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944118779615
Millett, S. (2017). Narrow Reading: Effects on EFL Learners’ Reading Speed, Comprehension, and Perceptions. Reading in a Foreign Language (Honolulu, HI), 29(1), 1–19.
Min, H.-T. (2008). EFL vocabulary acquisition and retention: reading plus vocabulary enhancement activities and Narrow Reading. Language Learning, 58(1).
Mizrachi, D. (2014). Online or print: Which do students prefer? Communications in Computer and Information Science, 492, 733–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14136-7_76
Munita, F. (2019). “A return to readingâ€, or the importance of personal reading in language and literature ongoing teacher education. Profesorado, 23(3), 413–430. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v23i3.11236
OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 Results: Executive Summary. In OECD. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/46619703.pdf
Olsen, A. N., Kleivset, B., & Langseth, H. (2013). E-Book Readers in Higher Education: Student Reading Preferences and Other Data From Surveys at the University of Agder. Sage Open, 3(2).
Olson, C. B. (1992). Thinking Writing: Fostering Critical Thinking through Writing. Harper Collins Publishers, Inc.
Olson, D. . (1994). The world on paper. Cambridge University Press.
Pietilä, P., & Merikivi, R. (2014). The impact of free-time reading on foreign language vocabulary development. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.5.1.28-36
Pretorius, E. J. (2000). What they can’t read will hurt them: reading and academic achievement. Innovation, 20, 33–41.
Renandya, W. A. (2014). Motivation in the language classroom.
Suk, N. (2017). The Effects of Extensive Reading on Reading Comprehension, Reading Rate, and Vocabulary Acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.152
Thomson, S., Hillman, K., & De Bortoli, L. (2013). A teacher ’ s Guide to PISA Reading Literacy.
Thums, K., Artelt, C., & Wolter, I. (2021). Reading for entertainment or information reception? Gender differences in reading preferences and their impact on text-type-specific reading competences in adult readers. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36(2), 339–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00486-1
Waring, R. ., & McLean, S. (2015). Exploration of the Core and Variable Dimensions of Extensive Reading Research and Pedagogy. Reading in a Foreign Language, 27(1), 160–167.
Zasacka, Z. (2017). Screen-based reading practices – results of the. 99–114. https://doi.org/10.24131/3724.170507
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.



