The Impact of Research Methodology and Statistics Mastery on the Quality of Student Theses in Elementary School Teacher Education Department

Authors

  • Muhammad Yasin Universitas Halu Oleo, Kendari, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i3.4172

Keywords:

Research Methodology, Statistics Material. Thesis Quality

Abstract

Thesis is one of the biggest challenges for students. This is because students often do not understand the method of writing a thesis as a scientific paper. This research was carried out to examine the mastery of research methodology and statistics on the quality of student thesis. The research method used in this study is quantitative research. The results of this study then found a positive and very significant relationship between mastery of educational research methodology material and the quality of the thesis. Then a positive and very significant relationship was also found between the level of student mastery of the statistics course material and thesis quality. Finally, the hypothesis testing concluded that between the variables of student mastery of research methodology material and statistics course material, there was a positive and very significant relationship with the thesis quality of university students.

References

Al-Samarraie, H., Shamsuddin, A., & Alzahrani, A. I. (2020). A flipped classroom model in higher education: a review of the evidence across disciplines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 1017–1051.

Antonoplis, S. (2023). Studying socioeconomic status: Conceptual problems and an alternative path forward. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(2), 275–292.

Casula, M., Rangarajan, N., & Shields, P. (2021). The potential of working hypotheses for deductive exploratory research. Quality & Quantity, 55(5), 1703–1725.

d’Hont, F. M., & Slinger, J. H. (2022). Including local knowledge in coastal policy innovation: comparing three Dutch case studies. Local Environment, 27(7), 897–914.

De Boer, H. (2021). COVID-19 in Dutch higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 46(1), 96–106.

Dimova, S. (2020). English language requirements for enrolment in EMI programs in higher education: A European case. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 47, 100896.

Elmore, R. L. (2021). Reflections on mentoring online doctoral learners through the dissertation. Christian Higher Education, 20(1–2), 57–68.

Fahd, K., Miah, S. J., Ahmed, K., Venkatraman, S., & Miao, Y. (2021). Integrating design science research and design based research frameworks for developing education support systems. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 4027–4048.

Findley, K. (2022). NAVIGATING A DISCIPLINARY CHASM: THE STATISTICAL PERSPECTIVES OF GRADUATE TEACHING ASSISTANTS. Statistics Education Research Journal, 21(1), 12.

Gunawardena, M., & Wilson, K. (2021). Scaffolding students’ critical thinking: A process not an end game. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100848.

Hayashi Jr, P., Abib, G., & Hoppen, N. (2019). Validity in qualitative research: A processual approach. The Qualitative Report, 24(1), 98–112.

Iqbal, J., Qureshi, N., Ashraf, M. A., Rasool, S. F., & Asghar, M. Z. (2021). The effect of emotional intelligence and academic social networking sites on academic performance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 905–920.

Kwangmuang, P., Jarutkamolpong, S., Sangboonraung, W., & Daungtod, S. (2021). The development of learning innovation to enhance higher order thinking skills for students in Thailand junior high schools. Heliyon, 7(6), e07309.

Lemon, L. L., & Hayes, J. (2020). Enhancing trustworthiness of qualitative findings: Using Leximancer for qualitative data analysis triangulation. The Qualitative Report, 25(3), 604–614.

Li, Y., Zhang, X., Dai, D. Y., & Hu, W. (2021). Curriculum innovation in times of the COVID-19 pandemic: the thinking-based instruction theory and its application. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 601607.

Manych, N., Müller-Hansen, F., & Steckel, J. C. (2023). The political economy of coal across 12 countries: Analysing qualitative interviews with topic models. Energy Research & Social Science, 101, 103137.

McChesney, K., & Aldridge, J. (2019). Weaving an interpretivist stance throughout mixed methods research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 42(3), 225–238.

Mech, A., Gottardo, S., Amenta, V., Amodio, A., Belz, S., Bøwadt, S., … Małyska, A. (2022). Safe-and sustainable-by-design: The case of Smart Nanomaterials. A perspective based on a European workshop. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 128, 105093.

Mundher, R., Abu Bakar, S., Maulan, S., Mohd Yusof, M. J., Al-Sharaa, A., Aziz, A., & Gao, H. (2022). Aesthetic quality assessment of landscapes as a model for urban forest areas: A systematic literature review. Forests, 13(7), 991.

Nind, M. (2020). A new application for the concept of pedagogical content knowledge: teaching advanced social science research methods. Oxford Review of Education, 46(2), 185–201.

Pauliuk, S., Koslowski, M., Madhu, K., Schulte, S., & Kilchert, S. (2022). Co-design of digital transformation and sustainable development strategies-What socio-metabolic and industrial ecology research can contribute. Journal of Cleaner Production, 343, 130997.

Sá, M. J., Santos, A. I., & Serpa, S. (2021). The academic supervisor of higher education students’ final projects: A gatekeeper of quality. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(1), 152–160.

Schäfer, T., & Schwarz, M. A. (2019). The meaningfulness of effect sizes in psychological research: Differences between sub-disciplines and the impact of potential biases. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 813.

Sima, V., Gheorghe, I. G., Subić, J., & Nancu, D. (2020). Influences of the industry 4.0 revolution on the human capital development and consumer behavior: A systematic review. Sustainability, 12(10), 4035.

Simamora, R. M., De Fretes, D., Purba, E. D., & Pasaribu, D. (2020). Practices, challenges, and prospects of online learning during Covid-19 pandemic in higher education: Lecturer perspectives. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 1(3), 185–208.

Wang, J., Wang, Y., Wipfli, K., Thacker, B., & Hart, S. (2023). Investigating learning assistants’ use of questioning in online courses about introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(1), 010113.

Williams Jr, R. I., Clark, L. A., Clark, W. R., & Raffo, D. M. (2021). Re-examining systematic literature review in management research: Additional benefits and execution protocols. European Management Journal, 39(4), 521–533.

Zamora-Polo, F., & Sánchez-Martín, J. (2019). Teaching for a better world. Sustainability and sustainable development goals in the construction of a change-maker university. Sustainability, 11(15), 4224.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-29

How to Cite

Yasin, M. (2023). The Impact of Research Methodology and Statistics Mastery on the Quality of Student Theses in Elementary School Teacher Education Department. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(3), 4226–4239. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i3.4172

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 3 (2023): AL-ISHLAH: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.