Management of Islamic Education Institutions in Motivation and Decision Making

Authors

  • Candra Wijaya UIN Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
  • Poniman Adyanto Dinas Pendidikan Kabupaten Deli Serdang, Indonesia
  • Darno Darno Pokjawas Kemenag Kab. Langkat, Indonesia
  • Yulinar Yulinar Kemenag Kab Langkat, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Fadli IAIN LANGSA, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i1.709

Keywords:

Educational Institutions, Motivation, Decision Making

Abstract

The study aims to describe the role of school principals in making decisions to improve the quality of education at MTs Islamiyah YPI Batang Kuis. It reveals 1) The decision-making process carried out by school principals to improve the quality of education, 2) Participation in decision-making carried out by school principals to improve education quality, and 3) Evaluation of the implementation of decisions to improve the quality of education. The method used is qualitative, while the approach used is descriptive, with research data collection obtained by observation, Interview, and documentation techniques. The results of this study reveal the findings, namely: 1) The decision-making process carried out by the Principal of MTs Islamiyah YPI Batang Kuis by analyzing the problem, developing alternative solutions, deciding on alternatives, implementing and evaluating 2) Participation carried out by the principal of MTs Islamiyah YPI Batang Kuis is to involve: foundations, teachers' councils and administrative staff in decision making. To carry out this participation can be done in various ways, for example by meeting / deliberation and asking for responses, 3) Evaluation of the implementation of decisions made by the principal of MTs Islamiyah YPI Batang Kuis carried out by all components within the institution and who are responsible for evaluating decisions, namely all parties involved in implementing the decision.

References

Adu-Agyem, J., & Osei-Poku, P. (2012). Quality education in Ghana: The way forward. International Journal of Innovative Research & Development, 1(9), 164–177. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314414554_Quality_Education_In_Ghana_The_Way_Forward

Cabantous, L., & Gond, J. P. (2011). Rational decision making as performative praxis: Explaining rationality’s éternel retour. Organization Science, 22(3), 573–586. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0534

Daryani, S. M., & Amini, A. (2016). Management and Organizational Complexity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 230(May), 359–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.09.045

Egan, K., Harcourt, D., Rumsey, N., Newman, S., Newell, R., Moss, T., Clarke, A., Charlton, R., Thompson, A., Lindenmeyer, A., Clarke, S. A., White, P., Byron-Daniel, J., Jenkinson, E., Williams, E., James, H., Saul, K., & Walsh, E. (2011). A qualitative study of the experiences of people who identify themselves as having adjusted positively to a visible difference. Journal of Health Psychology, 16(5), 739–749. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105310390246

Farrokhi, F., & Mahmoudi-Hamidabad, A. (2012). Rethinking convenience sampling: Defining quality criteria. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(4), 784–792. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.4.784-792

Fitzsimons, D., James, K. T., & Denyer, D. (2011). Alternative approaches for studying shared and distributed leadership. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(3), 313–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00312.x

Glöckner, A., & Herbold, A. K. (2011). An eye-tracking study on information processing in risky decisions: Evidence for compensatory strategies based on automatic processes. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24(1), 71–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.684.

Ikhwan, A. (2019). Sistem kepemimpinan islami: instrumen inti pengambil keputusan pada lembaga pendidikan islam. Istawa: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 3(2), 111-154.

Kallunki, J. P., Laitinen, E. K., & Silvola, H. (2011). Impact of enterprise resource planning systems on management control systems and firm performance. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 12(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2010.02.001

Khadijah, M., Bashayer, A., & Azrilah, A. (2016). Total Quality Management in saudi higher education. International Journal of Computer Applications, 135(4), 06–12. https://doi.org/10.1108/09544789510103699

Koç, T., Turan, A. H., & Okursoy, A. (2016). Acceptance and usage of a mobile information system in higher education: An empirical study with structural equation modeling. International Journal of Management Education, 14(3), 286–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2016.06.001

Prahara, R. S., Wahyono, H., & Utomo, S. H. (2017, December). Menentukan Kualitas Pembelajaran Ekonomi Berwawasan Lingkungan Berdasarkan Input-Proses-Output Pembelajaran. In National Conference On Economic Education.

Sikumbang, H. R., & Afriansyah, H. (2019). Implementasi Teknik Pengambilan Keputusan Untuk Mengembangkan Mutu Pendidikan Di Sekolah.

Suliswiyadi, S. (2015). Menumbuhkan Dan Mengembangkan Mutu Sekolah Unggul Di Kabupaten Magelang. Jurnal Tarbiyatuna, 6(2), 91-104.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-07

How to Cite

Wijaya, C., Adyanto, P., Darno, D., Yulinar, Y., & Fadli, M. (2022). Management of Islamic Education Institutions in Motivation and Decision Making. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(1), 687–696. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i1.709

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 1 (2022): AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.