Perceptions with Non-English Educational Background Competence in English Teaching

Authors

  • Andi Mukarramah Nagauleng Institut Agama Islam Negeri Manado Jl. Dr. H. Sarundajang Kawasan Ringroad, Manado, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Andi Asrifan Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidenreng Rappang, Sulawesi Selatan, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Ahmad Mustamir Waris Institut Agama Islam Negeri Manado Jl. Dr. H. Sarundajang Kawasan Ringroad, Manado, Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i2.839

Keywords:

Teacher skills, Non-english teacher background, English teaching

Abstract

This research's purposes were: (1) exploring the perceptions of non-English teachers in teaching English at IAIN Manado; (2) assessing the ability of non-English teachers to attain IAIN Manado student qualifications. This study uses a mixed research method based on an exploratory sequence. The research was conducted using IAIN Manado Purposive sampling technique, and the researcher determined the research object by specific criteria. The study results show: (1) They loved how a non-English professor teaches English. They say that if a non-English teacher is amiable in teaching, he often motivates students to learn English. They also value non-English-based lecturers. Students also actively follow teaching and learning activities, (2) Student evaluations also were found in pre-test and post-test data when post-test ratings were increased, with 7 (41.17%) having an average value, 5 (29.42%) with good ratings, 4 (23.0%) with poor scores, and 1 (5.89%) with very good ratings. This means a significant increase in English language learning by non-English lecturers.

Author Biography

Andi Mukarramah Nagauleng, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Manado Jl. Dr. H. Sarundajang Kawasan Ringroad, Manado, Indonesia

Dosen Fakultas Tarbiah dan Ilmu Keguruan, IAIN Manado

References

Anwar, S. (2007). Kompetensi Guru Madrasah, Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Agama. Jakarta.

Atweh, B., Bleicher, R. E., & Cooper, T. J. (1998). The construction of the social context of mathematics classrooms: A sociolinguistic analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 63–82.

Bailey, M. K. (2006). Language Teacher Supervision: A case-based approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Barnhart, S. W. (1998). Commodity futures prices and economic news: An examination under alternative monetary regimes. Journal of Futures Markets, 8(4), 483–510.

Boon, A. (2011). The reflective teacher: Towards self-actualization. The Language Teacher, 35(4), 27–30.

Borg, S. (2006). Teacher Cognition and Language Education: Research and Practice. London: Continuum.

Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of language learning and teaching. New York: Pearson.

Cheung, H. Y. (2006). The measurement of teacher efficacy: Hong Kong primary in-service teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 32(4), 435–451.

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Cripps Clark, J., & Walsh, J. (2002). Elements of a model of effective teachers. AARE 2002: Problematic Futures: Educational Research in an Era of Uncertainty; AARE 2002 Conference Papers. Australian Association for Research in Education.

Deakin, C. R. (2008). Pedagogy for Citizenship. In Getting Involved: Global Citizenship Development and Sources of Moral Values (pp. 31–55). Rotterdam: Sense Publisher.

Donald, A., Jacobs, C., & Razavieh, A. (2007). Pengantar Penelitian Dalam Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Edwards, R. (2014). Amateurism and professionalism in work and learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 26(6/7), 406–417.

Francesca, C., Ana, L. N., Jérôme, M., & Frits, T. (2011). OECD health policy studies help wanted? Providing and paying for long-term care: providing and paying for long-term care. OECD Publishing.

Gonzales, J., & Wagenaar, R. (2005). Tuning Educational Structures in Europe II: Universities’ Contribution to the Bologna Process. Universidad de Deusto.

Gupta, K. (1999). A practical guide for need assessment. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons. Inc.

Hamalik, O. (2007). Dasar-dasar Pengembangan Kurikulum. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Harmer, J. (2008). How to teach English. London: Longman.

KatÄne, I., Aizsila, A., & Beitere., Z. (2006). Teacher competence and further education as priorities for sustainable development of rural schools in Latvia. Journal of Teacher Education and Training, 6, 41–59.

Kral, T. J. (1988). Life-saving techniques for the foreign language learner lost at sea. English Teaching Forum, 26(6–14).

Mulyasa, E. (2009). Standar Kompetensi dan Sertifikasi Guru. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Musfah, J. (2011). Peningkatan Kompetensi Guru: Melalui Pelatihan dan Sumber Belajar Teori dan Praktek. Jakarta: Kencana.

Pickens, J. (2005). Attitudes and perceptions. Organizational Behavior in Health Care, 43–76.

Rao, G. R., Rao, V. R., Prasanth, V. P., Khannal, N. P., Yadav, N. K., & Gowda, C. L. L. (2009). Farmers’ perception on plant protection in India and Nepal: a case study. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 29(3), 158–168.

Rinantanti, Y., Rahman, M. A., Atmowardoyo, H., & Bin-Tahir, S. Z. (2017). Perception of Senior High School EFL Teachers in Papua, Indonesia towards Their Own Competence. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(6), 1181–1189.

Robin, A. C., Reylé, C., Derriere, S., & Picaud, S. (2003). A synthetic view on structure and evolution of the Milky Way. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 409(2), 523–540.

Schacter, D. L., Guerin, S. A., & Jacques, P. L. S. (2011). Memory distortion: An adaptive perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(10), 467–474.

Shishavan, H. B., & Sadeghi, K. (2009). Characteristics of an effective English language teacher as perceived by Iranian teachers and learners of English. English Language Teaching, 2(4), 130–143.

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.

Soepriyatna. (2012). Investigating and Assessing Competence of High School Teacers of English in Indonesia. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 8(2), 38–49.

Sugiono. (2005). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfbeta.

Taneri, A. (2018). Osmanlı Devleti’nin Kuruluş Döneminde Hükümdarlık Kurumunun Gelişmesi ve Saray Hayatı.

Tsui, A. B. M. (2003). Understanding expertise in teaching: Case studies of ESL teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wang, Z., & Li, Q. (2007). Video quality assessment using a statistical model of human visual speed perception. JOSA A, 24(12), B61--B69.

Warburton, E. C. (2004). Knowing what it takes: the effect of perceived learner advantages on dance teachers’ use of criticalâ€thinking activities. Research in Dance Education, 5(1), 69–82.

Downloads

Published

2021-08-31

How to Cite

Nagauleng, A. M., Asrifan, A., & Waris, A. M. (2021). Perceptions with Non-English Educational Background Competence in English Teaching. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(2), 1259–1268. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i2.839

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 2 (2021): AL-ISHLAH: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.