Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Sociological Review of Its Role in Fostering Quality and Equity

Authors

  • Aep Saepuloh UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
  • Moh. Dulkiah UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
  • Dikdik Firman Sidik Universitas Persatuan Islam, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v18i1.8839

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, quality education, sociology, educational technology, accessibility

Abstract

This study employs a qualitative narrative review of literature published between 2010 and 2024. Sources were selected based on relevance to AI in education and engagement with sociological concepts such as equity, digital divide, and social interaction. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis and interpreted through sociological frameworks, including Bourdieu’s theory of capital, Bernstein’s pedagogic control, and Vygotsky’s social learning theory. The findings indicate that AI contributes to improved instructional quality through personalized learning, enhanced engagement, and efficient feedback mechanisms. AI also expands educational access, particularly for learners in remote areas. However, its implementation remains uneven, with disparities in infrastructure, digital access, and teacher readiness. Additionally, increased reliance on AI may reduce face-to-face interaction and shift pedagogical authority toward algorithmic systems. The study reveals that AI functions as a dual-pathway mechanism: it enhances educational quality and access while simultaneously reinforcing existing social inequalities. Its impact is shaped by institutional capacity, digital capital, and pedagogical practices, highlighting that AI is not a neutral tool but a sociotechnical construct embedded in broader social structures. AI has the potential to support equitable and high-quality education, but only when supported by inclusive policies, adequate infrastructure, and strong teacher capacity. A sociologically informed approach is essential to ensure that AI integration promotes educational equity rather than deepening existing disparities.

References

Baker, R. S., & Inventado, P. S. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In J. A. Larusson & B. White (Eds.), Learning analytics: From research to practice (pp. 61–75). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3305-7_4

Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique (Rev. ed.). Rowman & Littlefield. https://rowman.com/ISBN/9780847693431

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press. https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/fr/bourdieu-forms-capital.htm

Chen, C. M., & Cheng, Y. Y. (2018). Personalized mobile learning system for supporting effective English learning. Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 100–114.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/26388380

Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.

https://www.continuumbooks.com/books/detail.aspx?BookId=166174

Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203166093

Luckin, R. (2017). Towards artificial intelligence-based assessment systems. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, Article 0028. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0028

Popenici, S. A. D., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 22.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8

Rai, A., & Tang, X. (2018). Information technology-enabled business models: A conceptual framework and a coevolution perspective. Information Systems Research, 29(3), 511–529.

https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2018.0798

Schmid, M., & Petko, D. (2019). Does the use of educational technology in personalized learning environments correlate with self-reported digital skills and beliefs of teachers? Computers & Education, 136, 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.006

Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury.

https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474258324

Siemens, G. (2013). Learning analytics: The emergence of a discipline. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1380–1400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213498851

Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance. Educational Research Review, 17, 1–13.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.11.001

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674576292

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Zhang, J., & Zheng, Y. (2020). How does AI-based tutoring influence student achievement? Computers in Human Behavior, 110, 106383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106383

Downloads

Published

2026-03-20

How to Cite

Saepuloh, A., Dulkiah, M., & Sidik, D. F. (2026). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Sociological Review of Its Role in Fostering Quality and Equity. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 18(1), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v18i1.8839

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 1 (2026): MARCH 2026

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.