Evaluating of Islamic Religious Education Curriculum Management Program at Madrasah Tsanawiyah in North Sumatera

Authors

  • Syafaruddin Syafaruddin UIN Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Edi Saputra UIN Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Sutrisno Sutrisno UIN Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i1.934

Keywords:

Program Evaluation, Curriculum, Management, CIPP, Islamic Religious Education

Abstract

This study aims to obtain the evaluation results of the Islamic Religious Education curriculum management program at Madrasah Tsanawiyah in North Sumatra using the CIPP evaluation model (Context, Input, Process, and Product). This research is qualitative research with a management approach, and research data is obtained through participant observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation studies. In contrast, the data analysis uses descriptive analysis by reducing data, displaying data and drawing conclusions. The results show that in terms of context, the form of the Islamic Education curriculum used was based on the 2013 curriculum in the subjects of the Hadith Qur'an, Aqidah Akhlak, Fiqh, SKI, and three pesantren subjects, namely Arabic (Nahwu sorof), Calligraphy, and Takhfidzul Qur. Local curriculum-based is a basic need for schools, especially the community and students, in terms of input, the availability of adequate infrastructure, teacher qualifications according to scientific disciplines, although in terms of pedagogical competence, it is still not optimal in terms of process, program The Islamic Religious Education curriculum can be implemented well even though it is not optimal and sometimes there are still activities that are carried out, some are appropriate and some are not appropriate, in terms of product, the PAI curriculum provides a new direction that can build positive and negative civilizations both madrasas, teachers and student.

Author Biographies

Syafaruddin Syafaruddin, UIN Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

manajemen dan pendidikan

Edi Saputra, UIN Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

manajemen dan pendidikan

Sutrisno Sutrisno, UIN Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

manajemen dan pendidikan

References

Alfiansyah, M., Assingkily, M. S., & Prastowo, A. (2020). Kebijakan Internal Madrasah Dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Pendidikan Di MI Nurul Ummah Kotagede Yogyakarta. MAGISTRA: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Pendidikan Dasar Dan Keislaman, 11(1), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.31942/MGS.V11I1.3460

Alismail, H. A., & McGuire, P. (2015). 21st Century Standards and Curriculum: Current Research and Practice. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(6), 150–155.

amalina, nur. (2019). Evaluasi Program Desain Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Melalui Model Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP). Kelola: Journal of Islamic Education Management, 4(2), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.24256/KELOLA.V4I2.870

Arikunto, & Yuliana. (2008). Manajemen Pendidikan. Aditya Media.

Bhakti, Y. B. (2017). Evaluasi Program Model CIPP Pada Proses Pembelajaran IPA. JIPFRI: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika Dan Riset Ilmiah, 1(2).

Böhlmark, A., Grönqvist, E., & Vlachos, J. (2016). The Headmaster Ritual: The Importance of Management for School Outcomes. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 118(4), 912–940. https://doi.org/10.1111/SJOE.12149

Darma, I. K. (2019). The effectiveness of teaching program of CIPP evaluation model. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT & Scientific Research, 5(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjeis.v5n3.619

Djuanda, I. (2020). Implementasi Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Karakter Model Cipp (Context, Input, Process Dan Output). Al Amin: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Dan Budaya Islam, 3(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.36670/ALAMIN.V3I1.39

Indriana, D. (2018). Evaluasi Pembelajaran dan Penilaian Autentik dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab. Al-Ittijah : Jurnal Keilmuan Dan Kependidikan Bahasa Arab, 10(2), 34–52. https://doi.org/10.32678/AL-ITTIJAH.V10I02.1245

Junanto, S., & Kusna, N. A. A. (2018). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran di PAUD Inklusi dengan Model Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP). INKLUSI Journal of Disability Studies, 5(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.14421/IJDS.050202

Komenda, M., Schwarz, D., HÅ™ebíÄek, J., HolÄík, J., & DuÅ¡ek, L. (2014). A framework for curriculum management: The use of outcome-based approach in practice. CSEDU 2014 - Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, 1, 473–478. https://doi.org/10.5220/0004948104730478

Laasch, O. (2015). Teaching Ethice A Croos the Management Curriculum. Business Expert Press.

M Prendergast, P. T. (2018). Curriculum reform in Irish secondary schools? A focus on algebra. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(1), 126–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2017.1313315

M Priestley, C. S. (2014). Downgraded curriculum? An analysis of knowledge in new curricula in Scotland and New Zealand. Curriculum Journal, 25(1), 50–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2013.872047

Mahmudi, I. (2011). CIPP: Suatu Model Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. At-Ta’dib, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.21111/AT-TADIB.V6I1.551

Muyana, S. (2017). Context Input Process Product (CIPP): Model Evaluasi Layanan Informasi. Prosiding Seminar Bimbingan Dan Konseling. http://pasca.um.ac.id/conferences/index.php/snbk/article/view/257.

Muyasaroh, M., & Sutrisno, S. (2014). Pengembangan Instrumen Evaluasi Cipp Pada Program Pembelajaran Tahfiz Al-Qur’an Di Pondok Pesantren. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v18i2.2862

Riptiani, K. M., Manuaba, I. B. S., & Putra, M. (2015). STUDI EVALUASI IMPLEMENTASI KURIKULUM 2013 DITINJAU DARI CIPP PADA SEKOLAH DASAR NEGERI DI WILAYAH PEDESAAN KABUPATEN BADUNG. MIMBAR PGSD Undiksha, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/JJPGSD.V3I1.5015

Rusman. (2012). Manajemen Kurikulum. Rajawali Press.

Sintawati, E., & Sudjimat, D. A. (2014). Evaluasi Program Praktik Industri Mahasiswa Program Studi Tata Busana Jurusan Teknologi Industri Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Malang Berdasarkan Model CIPP. Teknologi Dan Kejuruan: Jurnal Teknologi, Kejuruan Dan Pengajarannya, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.17977/TK.V37I1.4107

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2014). Evaluation, Theory, Model & Applications.

Sudarman, S. (2019). Kebijakan Internal Madrasah Dalam Memenuhi Kepuasan Orang Tua Siswa Di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Negeri 1 Kulon Progo. Al-Bidayah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam, 11(1), 195–225. https://doi.org/10.14421/AL-BIDAYAH.V11I01.178

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sundari, R., & Sundari, R. (2013). Evaluasi Pemanfaatan Laboratorium Dalam Pembelajaran Biologi Di Madrasah Aliyah Negeri Sekabupaten Sleman. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v12i2.1427

Syafaruddin. (2005). Manajemen Lembaga Pendidikan Islam. Ciputat Press.

Syafaruddin, & Amiruddin. (2017). Manajemen Kurikulum. Perdana Publishing.

Ta’rifin, A. (2014). Kurikulum 2013: Quo Vadis Mutu Madrasah. JURNAL TARBIYAH, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.30829/TAR.V21I2.15

Tirado, M. C. B., & Barriga, F. D. (2016). Curriculum Management and the Role of Curriculum Actors. TCI (Transnational Curriculum Inquiry), 13(2), 13–33. https://doi.org/10.14288/TCI.V13I2.188285

Zainuddin, Z. (2016). Evaluasi Program Penyelenggaraan Madrasah Aliyah Negeri Di Aceh Timur. MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.30821/MIQOT.V40I1.261

Downloads

Published

2022-03-07

How to Cite

Syafaruddin, S., Saputra, E., & Sutrisno, S. (2022). Evaluating of Islamic Religious Education Curriculum Management Program at Madrasah Tsanawiyah in North Sumatera. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(1), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i1.934

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 1 (2022): AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.