Exploring the Impact of ICT and Learning Engagement on Academic Achievement and Self-Directed Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v18i3.9601Keywords:
ICT in education, learning engagement, self-directed learning, perceived academic achievement, General Higher EducationAbstract
Information and Communication Technology (ICT) has become integral to higher education, yet its relationships with different dimensions of student learning remain inconsistent. This study distinguishes between self-directed learning as a process-oriented outcome and perceived academic achievement as a performance-oriented outcome to provide a more differentiated understanding of technology-supported learning. A quantitative cross-sectional correlational design was employed involving 206 undergraduate students at Universitas Jambi, Indonesia. Data were collected using a 19-item questionnaire measuring ICT use, learning engagement, self-directed learning, and perceived academic achievement. Descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics version 26 to examine the associations of ICT use, learning engagement, and their interaction with the two learning outcomes. ICT use and learning engagement were significantly associated with self-directed learning (p = .001 and p < .001, respectively), and their interaction was also significant (p = .001). In contrast, ICT use (p = .968), learning engagement (p = .910), and their interaction (p = .858) were not significantly associated with perceived academic achievement. The findings indicate that technology-related learning experiences may be more closely associated with students’ self-directed learning processes than with their perceptions of academic performance. These results highlight the importance of evaluating ICT integration not solely through performance-oriented indicators but also through its relationship with learner autonomy, engagement, and self-regulation.
References
Akpen, C. N., Asaolu, S., Atobatele, S., Okagbue, H., & Sampson, S. (2024). Impact of online learning on student's performance and engagement: A systematic review. Discover Education, 3, Article 205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00253-0
Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., Buntins, K., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through educational technology in higher education: A systematic review in the field of arts and humanities. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 126–150. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5477
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
Chung, J., McKenzie, S., Schweinsberg, A., & Mundy, M. E. (2022). Correlates of academic performance in online higher education: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 820567. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.820567
Lai, Y., Saab, N., & Admiraal, W. (2022). Learning strategies in self-directed language learning using mobile technology in higher education: A systematic scoping review. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 7749–7780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10945-5
Nkomo, L. M., Daniel, B. K., & Butson, R. J. (2021). Synthesis of student engagement with digital technologies: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, Article 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00270-1
Prasse, D., Webb, M., Deschênes, M., Parent, S., Aeschlimann, F., Goda, Y., Yamada, M., & Raynault, A. (2024). Challenges in promoting self-regulated learning in technology supported learning environments: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29(4), 1809–1830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09772-z
Rashid, T., & Asghar, H. M. (2016). Technology use, self-directed learning, student engagement and academic performance: Examining the interrelations. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 604–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.084
Sailer, M., Maier, R., Berger, S., Kastorff, T., & Stegmann, K. (2024). Learning activities in technology-enhanced learning: A systematic review of meta-analyses and second-order meta-analysis in higher education. Learning and Individual Differences, 112, Article 102446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102446
Valverde-Berrocoso, J., Acevedo-Borrega, J., & Cerezo-Pizarro, M. (2022). Educational technology and student performance: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 916502. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.916502
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Yot-Domínguez, C., & Marcelo, C. (2017). University students’ self-regulated learning using digital technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14, Article 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0076-8
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Saharudin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.



