Reconceptualizing Arabic Language Education for Pluralism and Humanization through the L-STEAMS Framework

Authors

  • Iis Susiawati Institut Agama Islam Al-Zaytun Indonesia, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3109-7947
  • Lisnawati Lisnawati Institut Agama Islam Al-Zaytun Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Sholehatun Khasanah Institut Agama Islam Al-Zaytun Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Fatnah Wati Institut Agama Islam Al-Zaytun Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v18i2.9793

Keywords:

Arabic language education, pluralism, humanistic pedagogy, L-STEAMS Islamic higher education

Abstract

Arabic language education in contemporary Islamic higher education faces increasing demands to remain relevant within plural societies and rapidly changing social contexts. This article aims to analyze the role of university students in value-based Arabic language learning grounded in pluralism and humanization by examining the thought of Islamic educational scholars within the L-STEAMS framework (Law, Science, Technology/Engineering, Economic, Art, Mathematics, and Spiritual). This study employs a qualitative descriptive approach using library research. Data were derived from classical and contemporary Islamic educational literature, Arabic language pedagogy studies, and research on pluralism, humanization, and integrative education. The data were analyzed through content analysis and interpretative-critical synthesis. The findings indicate that Arabic language education needs to be reoriented from linguistic formalism toward a humanistic pedagogy integrating values of justice, tolerance, and social responsibility. University students, particularly in community engagement contexts such as Kuliah Kerja Nyata (KKN), function as integrative agents connecting language learning with social realities. The L-STEAMS framework offers a holistic model that links legal-ethical awareness, scientific literacy, economic empowerment, cultural creativity, instructional design, and spiritual values within Arabic language learning. This article contributes conceptually by proposing a pluralism-oriented, humanistic, and integrative model for Arabic language education as a future direction for Islamic higher education.

References

Abad-Célleri, M., Fajardo-Dack, T., & Argudo-Serrano, J. (2025). Critical Pedagogy for Humanizing EFL Education: A Qualitative Case Study. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(11). Retrieved from https://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/14701

Adiyono, A., & Sholeh, M. (2025). Can Fiqh Al-Ijtima‘Iyah Redefine Islamic Education in Indonesia? A Prisma Review of Social Values in Curriculum Reform (2017–2024). Australian Journal of Islamic Studies, 10(3), e101–e101. https://doi.org/10.55831/ajis.v10i3.805

Aedi, N., & Gorni, R. L. (2025). Lecturer–Learner Leadership and Its Impact on Student Learning Behavior in Islamic Higher Education. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 11(2), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v11i2.50285

Alghazali, F., & Alzyoudi, M. (2025). Exploring Linguistic Paradigms in Language Applications to Augment Arabic Language Acquisition. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 19(1), 241–251.

Asfihani, M. L., & Munidzar, H. A. (2025). Applying Humanistic Principles in Arabic Language Learning: A Literature Review on Developing Motivation and Learner Autonomy. Naatiq: Journal of Arabic Education, 2(2), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.33367/naatiq.v2i2.7039

Asnawi, N., & Zuhdi, M. (2025). Deconstructing Logocentrism and School-Centrism in Indonesia’s Islamic Education: A Critical Epistemological Analysis. Education Sciences, 15(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15121615

Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. SAGE.

Carrera-Rivera, A., Ochoa, W., Larrinaga, F., & Lasa, G. (2022). How-to conduct a systematic literature review: A quick guide for computer science research. MethodsX, 9, 101895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101895

Felsenthal, I., & Agbaria, A. (2026). ‘Justice before god’: Critical Islamic education based on the work of Tariq Ramadan. British Journal of Religious Education, 48(1), 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2025.2480655

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Herder and Herder.

Irham. (2025). Policies and patterns of integration of science and religion in Indonesian Islamic higher education. Higher Education, 90(5), 1311–1328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01378-9

Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Pearson Education, Incorporated.

Masdin, M., Ilham, M., Mulu, B., Nurfaidah, S., & Samrin, S. (2025). Dynamics of Interdisciplinary Islamic Education Learning in Indonesian High Schools Based on Islamic Law. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 9(3), 1371–1393. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v9.i3.30568

Militante, A., Ferrer, B., Añonuevo, B., Lara, R. B. D., Bastida, E., & Sabanal, J. J. (2025). Service-Learning Integration as Pedagogical Strategy for Enhancing Higher Education Students’ Global Citizenship Competencies. Journal of Social Knowledge Education (JSKE), 6(1), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.37251/jske.v6i1.1222

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Group, T. P. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLOS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Montero, P. (2023). From religious freedom to pluralism: Diversity as a value in School Religious Education in Paraná. Horizontes Antropológicos, 29, e650406. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9983e650406

Nguyen, Q. N., & Doan, D. T. H. (2026). Towards a five-dimensional affordance-based framework for social injustice research in language education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, 102613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102613

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide (pp. xv, 336). Malden: Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887

Polanin, J. R., Pigott, T. D., Espelage, D. L., & Grotpeter, J. K. (2019). Best practice guidelines for abstract screening large-evidence systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Research Synthesis Methods, 10(3), 330–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1354

Rehman, H. J. ur, Farooq, A., & Ismail, M. (2023). A Comparative Study on Educational Ethics: Insights from Islamic Educational Philosophy and Western Literature. Al-Idah, 41(2), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.37556/al-idah.041.02.0884

Repko, A. F., & Szostak, R. (2020). Interdisciplinary Research: Process and Theory. SAGE Publications.

Singh, W., Bhatt, P., Singh, M., & Pareek, S. K. (2023). Community Engagement in Higher Education: Weaving the Threads and Future Directions. In Community Engagement in Higher Education. Routledge India.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Supriyadi, T., Julia, Gunara, S., Rahman, A. A., & Djumaydillayevich, S. S. (2026). Arabic linguistic symbols and the internalization of students’ religious identity: A mixed methods analysis in the context of Islamic Religious Education. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 9(4), 2026181–2026181. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2026181

Susanto, Muafiah, E., Desrani, A., Ritonga, A. W., & Hakim, A. R. (2022). Trends of Educational Technology (EdTech): Students’ Perceptions of Technology to Improve the Quality of Islamic Higher Education in Indonesia. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(6). Retrieved from https://www.ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/5448

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

Warisno, A., Anshori, A., Hidayah, N., & Dwianto, A. (2025). Transformative Islamic Education Management in Madrasah and Pesantren Integrating Tradition and Digital Innovation. Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change, 276–289. https://doi.org/10.64753/jcasc.v10i2.1596

Downloads

Published

2026-07-01

How to Cite

Susiawati, I., Lisnawati, L., Khasanah, S., & Wati, F. (2026). Reconceptualizing Arabic Language Education for Pluralism and Humanization through the L-STEAMS Framework. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 18(2), 3136–3150. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v18i2.9793

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 2 (2026): JUNE 2026

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.