Bullying in Early Childhood Education: A Systematic Literature Review of Risk Factors, Contexts, and Prevention Strategies

Authors

  • Febi Wulandari Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Aan Listiana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Rita Mariyana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v18i2.9763

Keywords:

early childhood bullying, preschool peer aggression, early childhood education, systematic literature review, bullying prevention

Abstract

Bullying in early childhood has gained increasing attention due to its long-term impact on children’s social, emotional, and psychological development. However, existing reviews largely focus on school-aged populations, resulting in limited synthesis specific to early childhood, inconsistent conceptual definitions, and insufficient evidence on intervention effectiveness. This study aims to synthesize research trends and identify key determinants and intervention strategies related to bullying in early childhood education. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A structured search was performed in the Scopus database using the search string: TITLE-ABS-KEY ("bullying" AND ("early childhood" OR preschool OR kindergarten)). An initial broad search identified 32,709 records, which were refined to 798 topic-relevant studies. After applying inclusion criteria (journal articles, English language, open access, Scopus-indexed) and quality appraisal using CASP and MMAT, eight articles were included for qualitative synthesis. The findings indicate that bullying in early childhood is shaped by multi-level factors, including biological predispositions, peer relationship dynamics, parental and teacher perceptions, socioeconomic conditions, and digital environments. Conceptual inconsistencies were identified, with some studies interpreting aggressive behavior as normal developmental conflict, while others emphasize repetition, intentional harm, and power imbalance. Evidence on intervention effectiveness remains limited, although school-based programs show potential. These findings highlight the need for comprehensive, evidence-based prevention strategies. Implications include strengthening teacher training, integrating anti-bullying curricula, and enhancing parent–school collaboration. This review contributes by providing a focused synthesis of early childhood bullying and identifying directions for future research and intervention development.

References

Aisyah, E. N., Harun, H., Rohman, A., & Hardika, H. (2021). The analysis of child bullying behaviour of game mobile learning users, in the early childhood education management perspective. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 15(09), 4. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i09.21583

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.

Barnett-Page, E., & Thomas, J. (2009). Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-59

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press.

Chalamandaris, A.-G., & Piette, D. (2015). School-based anti-bullying interventions: systematic review of the methodology to assess their effectiveness. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 24, 131–174. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.04.004

Falla, D., Sánchez, S., & Casas, J. A. (2021). What do we know about bullying in schoolchildren with disabilities? A systematic review of recent work. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(1), 1–18. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010416

Fernandez-Alfaraz, M.-L., Nieto-Sobrino, M., Antón-Sancho, Ã., & Vergara, D. (2023). Perception of bullying in early childhood education in spain: pre-school teachers vs. Psychologists. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(3), 655–670. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13030050

Halliday, S., Gregory, T., Taylor, A., Digenis, C., & Turnbull, D. (2021). The impact of bullying victimization in early adolescence on subsequent psychosocial and academic outcomes across the adolescent period: a systematic review. Journal of School Violence, 20(3), 351–373. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2021.1913598

Hong, Q. N., Pluye, P., Fabregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Vedel, I. (2018). Mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT), version 2018. Education for Information.

Jenkins, L. N., Mulvey, N., & Floress, M. T. (2017). Social and language skills as predictors of bullying roles in early childhood: A narrative summary of the literature. Education and Treatment of Children, 40(3), 401–417. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2017.0017

Ju, H., & Lee, S. (2019). Mothers’ perceptions of the phenomenon of bullying among young children in south korea. Social Sciences, 8(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8010012

Kvestad, I., Adolfsen, F., Angeles, R. C., Brandseth, O. L., Breivik, K., Evertsen, J. G., Foer, I. K., Haaland, M., Homola, B. M., Hoseth, G. E., Jonsson, J., Kjerstad, E., Kyrrestad, H., Martinussen, M., Moberg, A., Moberg, K., Skogstrand, A., Solberg, L. R., & Aasheim, M. (2024). Effectiveness of a bullying intervention (be-prox) in norwegian early childhood and education care centers: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. JMIR Research Protocols, 13, e60626. https://doi.org/10.2196/60626

Lee, S. (2020). Kindergarten teachers’ perspectives on young children’s bullying roles in relation to dominance and peer relationships: a short-term longitudinal approach in south korea. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1734. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051734

Lerner, R. M. (2006). Developmental science, developmental systems, and contemporary theories of human development. Handbook of Child Psychology.

Liu, J., & Graves, N. (2011). Childhood bullying: A review of constructs, concepts, and nursing implications. Public Health Nursing, 28(6), 556–568. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1446.2011.00972.x

McFarland, L., Bull, R., Cumming, T., & Wong, S. (2024). Workplace bullying in early childhood education settings: prevalence and protective factors. International Journal of Early Childhood, 56(2), 189–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-022-00341-y

Musci, R. J., Bettencourt, A. F., Sisto, D., Maher, B., Uhl, G., Ialongo, N., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2018). Evaluating the genetic susceptibility to peer reported bullying behaviors. Psychiatry Research, 263, 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.03.016

Nocerino, R., Mercuri, C., Bosco, V., Aquilone, G., Guillari, A., Simeone, S., & Rea, T. (2024). Food allergy-related bullying in pediatric patients: a systematic review. Children, 11(12). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11121485

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 134, 178–189. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001

Perino, M. T., Sylvester, C. M., Rogers, C. E., Luby, J. L., & Barch, D. M. (2025). neighborhood resource deprivation as a predictor of bullying perpetration and resource-driven conduct symptoms. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 64(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2024.03.008

Podiya, J. K., Navaneetham, J., Bhola, P., Arelingaiah, M., G. Prabhu, S., Nag, R., Arasanahalli Lakshman, K., & Hugh-Jones, S. (2025). Anti-bullying interventions for secondary school adolescents in india: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. International Journal of Bullying Prevention. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-025-00308-2

Rico-González, M., Martínez-Merino, N., Ardigò, L. P., & Smaland Goth, U. (2025). Using physical education interventions to prevent bullying at school: a systematic review. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 39(1), 128–150. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2024.2369138

Saracho, O. N. (2017). Bullying prevention strategies in early childhood education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 45(4), 453–460. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-016-0793-y

Schwarzer, N.-H., Dees, P., Köstler, S., & Wagner, L. (2025). Effectiveness of school-based bullying prevention and intervention programs: Systematic review. Pravention Und Gesundheitsforderung. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11553-025-01263-y

Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews.

Wee, S.-J., & Lee, Y. (2020). Writing letters to characters in bullying-themed stories: An approach to educating about bullying in early childhood. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 45(3), 266–279. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/1836939120936002

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-05-22

How to Cite

Wulandari, F., Listiana, A., & Mariyana, R. (2026). Bullying in Early Childhood Education: A Systematic Literature Review of Risk Factors, Contexts, and Prevention Strategies. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 18(2), 1609–1620. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v18i2.9763

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 2 (2026): JUNE 2026

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.